|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
572
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 09:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
More spam |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
576
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 13:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:ban npc corp forum alts poor goons, you know ccp will not do that or maby you don't
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
576
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:ban npc corp forum alts poor goons, you know ccp will not do that or maby you don't learn english or stop posting don't have to
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
576
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
Geertruida Zelle wrote: If you want cuddles, pretty things and niceness then go play WoW.
Pubbies and hi-sec carebears should unite to save EvE - Vote Mittani!
(oh, and why has no one said nerf Titans yet?)
umadbro |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
581
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 18:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:CSM6 (chaired by Mittens!) is known for getting CCP to change their direction from developing designer spacejeans and Twilight Online to actually developing the core of EVE's gameplay. CSM3 is known for Larkonisgate. All the other CSM's are known for....
Exactly. Vote for Mittens. Prove it |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
581
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 19:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Syndic Thrass wrote:EVENews24 Headline: The Mittani advocates botting. The Mittani wrote:botting Well said.
But there was a quote somewhere that actualy says hesupports boting to bad i dont remember where it was exactly |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
584
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:CSM6 (chaired by Mittens!) is known for getting CCP to change their direction from developing designer spacejeans and Twilight Online to actually developing the core of EVE's gameplay. CSM3 is known for Larkonisgate. All the other CSM's are known for....
Exactly. Vote for Mittens. Prove it Okay. Can you name any significant achivement that any other CSM has achieved? Do they stack up to handling the Incarna diasater? I'm guessing not. Mittens' steadfastness in making CCP realise what a mistake they were making with Incarna was exactly what we needed in a chairman. His Skype channel and his thread about discussing issues with his constituents show a detail to the position that no other CSM could have pulled off, and the similar background of all of the CSM members helped get ideas pushed through to CCP more efficiently than past CSMs that tried to recognize every interest. CSM6 got a lot done, and I'm voting for Mittens again so that we can keep that trend going.
The CSM minutes are are anonymus and do not show individual views of CSM dudes, therefore you canot say what he did or did not. And the EVE playerbase reaction didn't affect CCP decision "only Mittani with hi chrisma " yea right ?
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
598
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 08:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
As CSM Chair, I offer sound guidance and guardianship of that power; I'm one of the first to truly wield it effectively. I'm here to protect the nullsec population against the existential danger of allowing an ignorant hiseccer and Greyscale to get together and talk about jump bridges. I'm here to keep the focus of the game on spaceships instead of a testbed for WoD or a venue for more pants. It's a guardianship.
Our savior...
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
608
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Yea
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
609
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 14:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Andski wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:The Mittani wrote:Inappropriate post removed. Please refrain from personal attacks. Spitfire I lol'd I've said before that I mostly like Mittens. He's done what he said he would do and I agree that his influence on the role of the CSM has been significant. In fact, I hope that he'll be elected again because I think his voice is one CCP needs to hear. That said, don't vote for him. He's got the voting might of Goonswarm behind him, He doesn't need yours. The Mittani needs opposition, voices to counter him when his ideas becomes too self-serving or fail to represent large portions of the Eve playerbase. There are a number of candidates out there who will represent other priorities, and they do need your vote. Friend, you should vote for Mittens. You may not believe that he needs your vote, but he does. Goonswarm may be a large 3000+ member alliance, but those votes alone will not secure the Chairmanship. It is not an important title, but it gives him a mandate. With this mandate, CCP will be even more inclined to listen to your concerns through his soft, soothing voice whispering into their ears in the Reykjavik bars. I have no doubt that The Mittani will secure the CSM 7 chairmanship, but even if it is completely inevitable, you should still give him your vote if you cannot think of a more worthy candidate with a real chance. Hehe... but he will get to the CSM7 thats engouth
|
|
|
|
|